21 May 2009

Test Results (gearing)



What I'm making of this is just that each cars characteristics seem to affect which gearing will be fastest, and affect it by such a small amount it is almost negligible. I would have to believe that having a 5th or 6th gear with a 1:1 ratio would make for better top end acceleration, while having a diff with a 4:1 ratio would positively effect lower speed acceleration, and many times AWDA’s gearboxes are half way between. This means no 1:1 gear as is traditional, but it does mean a pretty even acceleration through the gears, and in some cases (hopefully most) provides the best times. I will probably adjust some of the gearboxes, though not all.

19 May 2009

Ratio to Ratio

You’ll have to bear with me here as I try to figure something out about gearing. I wanted to redo all of my gear ratios, but it has turned into a mathematical and theoretical nightmare. Anything over a 1:1 ratio at the gearbox is said to negatively impact acceleration, and a closer ratio at the diff is said to also impact acceleration negatively. The problem is you can’t really have one without the other. For example if I were to use a 1700kg, 540hp, 322km/h car and make 5th gear 1:1 the final ratio would have to be 3.225:1. So suppose you consider that that differential ratio is too small, and will hurt acceleration, so you make 4th gear 1:1, now 5th gear will be about 0.785:1 and the diff. will be 4.150:1. So if you use that 4.1:1 diff. now 5th gear becomes an over gear, which is also supposed to negatively affect acceleration. Put the cars on a track and there is no difference what so ever in times. Which brings up the question, why does it matter? I honestly don’t know, just me striving for realism I suppose. What I’m doing is taking each car with the gearing I had previously made for it and running it to the rev limiter and then recording what speeds it reaches in those gears. With this information, and knowing the ratio I can use math to figure out the new settings I want. This number is only approximate, but it takes a lot of the guess work out of re-gearing. I built the equations up in excel so I only had to enter in numbers to get the approximate results. Yet now I'm trying to figure out if it is really worth it.

Here's kind of an example of how it works:


This is handy, but it still has not solved my problem. Why do manufactures use a 1:1 gear ratio anyway? I will probably only use this for new gear ratios and not change any more of the older ones.

12 May 2009

(GT4) Subaru Legacy B4 (updated)

Subaru Legacy B4 2.0GT specB



Power: 349bhp

Parts:
Sports Exhaust
Racing Brakes
Turbo Stage 1
Computer Equip
Close Transmission
Twin-plate Clutch
Semi-racing Flywheel
Carbon Driveshaft
FC Suspension
S3 Tires
VCD

Suspension:
Spring Rate: 8.0/7.5
Ride Height: 130/140
Bound: 3/2
Rebound: 8/5
Camber: 2.5/2.0
Toe: 1/0
Stabilizers: 2/2

VCD: 25

Notes:
From the outside the only thing to tell you this car is special is the lowered body on the large gold BBS wheels, the slightly more distinct splitter, and the Spec B badges. But if appearances fool you the price tag wont. At 85,250 Cr. It is priced to compete with a BMW M3 and it has the performance to match it, mind you that 85,250 Cr. makes this one of the cheapest cars AWDA has built. Despite its family saloon car appearance and affordability (compared to the other cars we’ve made), a lot of consideration went into this vehicle. The plan was to have 400hp, but 350hp was much more practical from this 2L turbo engine. Then there’s the gearbox. The HKS gearbox runs 5,600 Cr. and limits the cars top speed down 30kph from the stock one. Acceleration is improved but as you can see for yourself from the graphs below the car is only 0.2 seconds faster from a standing start over one km. One thing that numbers never can tell us is the way a car feels, and AWDA is big on feel. Hence the HKS gearbox was selected for the fact that it gives the car the feel of extra grunt when running out of corners. To compare this vehicle to others in its class of sporty four-seater saloon cars, B-spec was sent out to record times of cars with similar design, those results are posted below (cars prices listed with the cost of oil change, sports soft tires, and new wheels added).

P.S.
Need a little more top speed? Use the stock gearbox, but do give the HKS gearbox a try.





11 May 2009

(GT4) Proto Motors Spirra

Proto Motors Spirra 4.6 V8



Power: 354bhp

Parts:
Rigidity Increase
Sports Exhaust
Racing Brakes
Computer Equip
FC Transmission
Twin-plate Clutch
Semi-racing Flywheel
FC LSD
FC Suspension
S3 Tires

Suspension:
Spring Rate: 7.5/10.0
Ride Height: 135/134
Bound: 4/2
Rebound: 8/10
Camber: 2.0/0.5
Toe: 0/0
Stabilizers: 3/3

Transmission (set the transmission in the order that is listed):
Autoset: 15
1st: 2.880
2nd: 1.945
3rd: 1.445
4th: 1.120
5th: 0.885
6th: 0.710
Final Gear: 3.700

LSD:
Initial: 10
Acceleration: 28
Deceleration: 40

Notes:
By no means is the engine in this car in any way high tech, but that doesn’t stop every inch of this car from being super. This engine might not be the most impressive thing to come through the doors of Ford’s and Proto’s factory but it sounds like an orchestra of earthquakes, and you’ll realize when you put your foot down what matters isn’t the size of the engine, it is the near 355hp that will send this car past M3s. We originally wanted this engine to be supercharged to 460hp, quite like the Shelby GT500, but we realized that such a car was so fast it couldn’t compete with anything. It was too fast. To deal with this cars weight balance that resembles that of an old Porsche we practically lifted an LSD from the Porsche GT2, and played with the suspension until we made a vehicle that was wasn’t just drivable, but survivable. Of course in any car balanced like a Porsche you know what to look out for in handling. Hopefully we’ve transformed this car from axe murderer to gentle giant.

10 May 2009

(GT4) Jaguar S-Type R

Jaguar S-Type R



Power: 541bhp

Parts:
Port Polishing
Engine Balancing
Sports Exhaust
NA Tuning Stage 2
Computer Equip
FC Transmission
Twin-plate Clutch
Semi-racing Flywheel
FC LSD
Carbon Driveshaft
FC Suspension
S3 Tires

Suspension:
Spring Rate: 9.0/7.5
Ride Height: 119/128
Bound: 3/2
Rebound: 8/4
Camber: 2.3/3.0
Toe: 1/-1
Stabilizers: 2/1

Transmission (set the transmission in the order that is listed):
Autoset: 17
1st: 2.600
2nd: 1.775
3rd: 1.290
4th: 1.000
5th: 0.800
6th: 0.640
Final Gear: 3.700

LSD:
Initial: 10
Acceleration: 30
Deceleration: 5

Notes:
This car reminds me of a seventy-year-old man that never grew up. It is the sort of car that arrives wearing corduroy to the tune of Cities on Flame with Rock and then pulls your pants down and runs away, or would if he could run. So sure it isn’t the fastest car, but you’ll be holding on to your trousers whenever it is around. Even I thought I was joking when I decided to take this car for a drive, but really that was far from a fair attitude toward the old cat. Jaguars were revolutionary at one point in history, after all we had just invented the wheel and three days later Jaguar has the S-Type. The problem is that was the last time Jaguar made a new car. So this Jag is no M5, but it will put an E55 AMG in its place. The price tag isn’t the only thing rivals a Mercedes SL 600 (177.5k Cr.), the speed does too. This cars biggest problem is its looks. If they say the camera adds 10 pounds then this car must add 20 years. But let’s set aesthetics aside for a moment and talk some technical stuff. The 4.2L supercharged V8 now produces 540hp, and sounds wonderful doing it. And of course it still weighs in at 1800kg because no one is going to by a Jag for a stripped out racer. One thing that made this car manageable was the fact that Jaguar used double wishbone suspension all around. So if you feel like bringing the old tea and scones to a race buy this car and don’t forget your sweater vests.

09 May 2009

(GT4) Toyota MR2 Spyder

Toyota MR2 Spyder



Power: 216bhp

Parts:
Rigidity Increase (rollcage)
Semi-racing Exhaust
Racing Brakes
Turbo Stage 1
Computer Equip
FC Transmission
Twin-plate Clutch
Semi-racing Flywheel
2-way LSD
FC Suspension
S3 Tires

Suspension:
Spring Rate: 6.0/6.2
Ride Height: 110/125
Bound: 3/3
Rebound: 8/6
Camber: 2.2/2.6
Toe: 0/0
Stabilizers: 3/3

Transmission (set the transmission in the order that is listed):
Autoset: 7
1st: 3.085
2nd: 1.985
3rd: 1.510
4th: 1.220
5th: 1.000
6th: 0.825
Final Gear: 4.150

Notes:
I am a huge fan of the Lotus Elise so I figured I’d play with her sister car, this MR2. This car shares the 1.8L power plant with the Elise, but since it hasn’t been tuned to rev to 8,000+ RPM, this engine was the perfect candidate for a turbocharger. This MR2 is actually lighter than the original MR2, so this car is one of the few instances that a manufacture has made a car lighter than its predecessors. Yet lighter was not good enough for me. The newer car is too tame, too sane, and the chassis feels a bit well… indifferent. So AWDA gives you the new MkIII MR2 Turbo. This setup was all about making the car feel tauter, part of that was using a roll cadge to stiffen the chassis. Of course since this is a game I didn’t let cost be an issue, but I do try to keep the cars as affordable as possible. Just to top off the package, the car comes with Lotus Elise rims to keep things cool and light.

07 May 2009

Subaru Impreza Rally Car on GT4 @ Grand Canyon



Having a little fun in my Subaru, not the best time, but a good one for sure.
:3

05 May 2009

(GT4) Toyota Corolla

Toyota Corolla Runx Z



Power: 248bhp

Parts:
Engine Balancing
Semi-racing Exhaust
Racing Brakes
Brake Balance Controller
NA Tuning Stage 1
Computer Equip
FC Transmission
Twin-plate Clutch
Semi-racing Flywheel
1-way LSD
FC Suspension
S3 Tires

Brake Controller:
Brakes: 4/3

Suspension:
Spring Rate: 4.5/4.5
Ride Height: 130/135
Bound: 3/2
Rebound: 9/4
Camber: 2.2/3.5
Toe: -1/-1
Stabilizers: 1/1

Transmission (set the transmission in the order that is listed):
Autoset: 4
1st: 3.400
2nd: 2.390
3rd: 1.840
4th: 1.475
5th: 1.195
6th: 1.000
Final Gear: 3.760

Notes:
Older setup that I just now got around to posting. So far as I know it can win some of the Clubman Cup races.

18 April 2009

(GT4) Nissan 350Z

Nissan 350Z GT4 Limited Edition



Power: 334bhp

Parts:
Sports Exhaust
Racing Brakes
Computer Equip
Close Transmission
Twin-plate Clutch
Semi-racing Flywheel
FC LSD
Carbon Driveshaft
FC Suspension
S3 Tires

Suspension:
Spring Rate: 8.0/6.0
Ride Height: 99/110
Bound: 2/2
Rebound: 10/4
Camber: 2.5/3.5
Toe: 1/-1
Stabilizers: 2/2

LSD:
Initial: 10
Acceleration: 25
Deceleration: 5

Notes:
Like the GT-R, this car has been nothing but trouble. It is fast stock and it turns well stock, but the thing feels lazy and understeery all of the time. I hope to have change that characteristic of this car. This car is one of the most affordable that AWDA has made (87,150 Cr.), and one of the most useful (competitive in Japan Championship, Clubman Cup, NA Sport, and Club "Z").

(GT4) Nissan Skyline GT-R (R34)

Nissan Skyline GT-R V-spec II Nur



Power: 359bhp

Parts:
Racing Brakes
FC Transmission
Twin-plate Clutch
Semi-racing Flywheel
Carbon Driveshaft
FC Suspension
S3 Tires

Suspension:
Spring Rate: 7.8/8.8
Ride Height: 115/118
Bound: 3/2
Rebound: 8/6
Camber: 2.0/2.5
Toe: 0/0
Stabilizers: 3/2

Transmission (set the transmission in the order that is listed):
Autoset: 10
1st: 3.750
2nd: 2.620
3rd: 1.940
4th: 1.510
5th: 1.215
6th: 1.000
Final Gear: 3.800

Notes:
Finally the GT-R, a car that in the past has given me nothing but grief when I tried to setup the suspension. Of course I've in the past made it a point not to tune cars that didn't really need it, but I wanted a GT-R that drove the way I wanted it to drive. Though B-Spec would tell you that the stock suspension was faster, this setup feels more sharp as I like it.

15 April 2009

(GT4) Dodge Viper GTS

Dodge Viper GTS



Power: 536bhp

Parts:
Sports Exhaust
Racing Brakes
Brake Balance Controller
NA Tuning Stage 1
FC Transmission
Twin-plate Clutch
Semi-racing Flywheel
FC LSD
Carbon Driveshaft
FC Suspension
S3 Tires

Brake Controller:
Brakes: 7/5

Suspension:
Spring Rate: 10.0/9.0
Ride Height: 105/105
Bound: 3/3
Rebound: 8/6
Camber: 2.6/2.0
Toe: 1/0
Stabilizers: 2/2

Transmission (set the transmission in the order that is listed):
Autoset: 20
1st: 2.805
2nd: 1.790
3rd: 1.315
4th: 1.000
5th: 0.780
6th: 0.610
Final Gear: 4.000

LSD:
Initial: 10
Acceleration: 30
Deceleration: 10

Notes:
What a supercar was meant to be.

(GT4) BMW M Coupe

BMW M Coupe



Power: 350bhp

Parts:
Weight Reduction Stage 3
Rigidity Refresh
Sports Exhaust
Racing Brakes
NA Tuning Stage 1
FC Transmission
Twin-plate Clutch
Semi-racing Flywheel
FC LSD
Carbon Driveshaft
FC Suspension
S1-S3 Tires

Suspension:
Spring Rate: 6.0/4.5
Ride Height: 102/108
Bound: 2/2
Rebound: 10/4
Camber: 3.0/4.4
Toe: 0/-1
Stabilizers: 1/1

Transmission (set the transmission in the order that is listed):
Autoset: 19
1st: 3.270
2nd: 2.190
3rd: 1.625
4th: 1.260
5th: 1.000
6th: 0.835
Final Gear: 4.100

LSD:
Initial: 10
Acceleration: 35
Deceleration: 5

Ballast:
Ballast weight: 55kg
Location: 45

Notes:
This car is competitive in the club M races. The modified weight distribution extends tire life considerably. The car itself... what can I say, it is simply one of the most beautiful things on the road.

06 April 2009

(GT4) Aston Martin DB9

Aston Martin DB9



Power: 546bhp

Parts:
Port Polishing
Engine Balancing
Semi-racing Exhaust
Racing Brakes
Brake Balance Controller
NA Tuning Stage 1
Computer Equip
FC Transmission
Twin-plate Clutch
Semi-racing Flywheel
Carbon Driveshaft
FC Suspension
N3-S3 Tires

Brake Controller:
Brakes: 5/3

Suspension:
Spring Rate: 10.0/9.0
Ride Height: 115/120
Bound: 3/3
Rebound: 8/5
Camber: 2.5/2.4
Toe: 1/0
Stabilizers: 3/2

Transmission (set the transmission in the order that is listed):
Autoset: 18
1st: 3.000
2nd: 2.050
3rd: 1.460
4th: 1.115
5th: 0.870
6th: 0.700
Final Gear: 3.710

Notes:
I liked the new Bond movie, I thought it was one of the best Bond movies to come out in awhile. So to celebrate here's the Aston martin DB9. This DB9 has been tuned to the specs of the DBS while the gearbox has been made special for both good acceleration and a top speed of 322kph.

05 April 2009

(GT4) Alfa Romeo GT

Alfa Romeo GT



Power: 320bhp

Parts:
Engine Balancing
Sports Exhaust
Racing Brakes
NA Tuning Stage 1
Computer Equip
FC Transmission
Twin-plate Clutch
Semi-racing Flywheel
FC LSD
FC Suspension
S3 Tires

Suspension:
Spring Rate: 6.5/5.5
Ride Height: 95/102
Bound: 2/2
Rebound: 8/7
Camber: 2.0/2.0
Toe: 0/0
Stabilizers: 3/2

Transmission (set the transmission in the order that is listed):
Autoset: 14
1st: 2.970
2nd: 1.930
3rd: 1.525
4th: 1.230
5th: 1.000
6th: 0.830
Final Gear: 3.850

LSD:
Initial: 25
Acceleration: 35
Deceleration: 10

Notes:
I liked the new Bond movie, I thought it was one of the best Bond movies to come out in awhile. So to celebrate here's the Alfa Romeo GT James Bond edition. Sure it isn't the 159 but lets not be picky.

01 April 2009

April 1st Special

Toyota Prius



Power: 142bhp

Parts:
Port Polishing
Engine Balancing
Semi-racing Exhaust
Racing Brakes
NA Tuning Stage 3
Computer Equip
FC Suspension
R1 Tires

Suspension:
Spring Rate: 5.5/5.0
Ride Height: 110/120
Bound: 3/2
Rebound: 8/4
Camber: 2.0/2.0
Toe: 0/-1
Stabilizers: 2/2

Notes:
I'll admit, hybrids are a good thing, they're just not for everyone. Surely not for me. Enjoy your April 1st.

20 March 2009

(GT4) RUF BTR

RUF BTR



Power: 394bhp

Parts:
Racing Brakes
FC Transmission
FC LSD
FC Suspension
S3 Tires

Suspension:
Spring Rate: 8.5/10.0
Ride Height: 110/120
Bound: 4/4
Rebound: 8/10
Camber: 2.0/0.5
Toe: 0/0
Stabilizers: 4/5

Transmission (set the transmission in the order that is listed):
Autoset: 8
1st: 3.000
2nd: 2.160
3rd: 1.560
4th: 1.235
5th: 1.000
6th: 0.805
Final Gear: 3.650

LSD:
Initial: 15
Acceleration: 30
Deceleration: 30

Notes:
Of course the stock RUF BTR already handles well. The handling is friendly, but very very naughty. The thing takes every chance it gets to get sideways, which doesn’t very well suit my type of driving. The goal to this simple suspension modification is to make the car drift less often, while still keeping the slides that are necessary easy to control. This has inevitably introduced some understeer to the car, but I far prefer this setup to the stock one. Normally I would have much softer anti-roll bars; however with this chassis, the softer the anti-roll bars create a greater the tendency for the car to get the upper hand of the driver. Like with all Porsches, this RUF needs tender control input and it will reward you dearly.